Water

Let cows graze when nitrate contaminates groundwater

//07 Jul 2009
Although cattle add some nitrogen to pastures via their faeces and urine, it isn’t enough to warrant removing them from a pasture, according to Agricultural Research Service scientist Don Comis, even if the pasture is above groundwater contaminated by high levels of nitratenitrogen.

Farmers who find excessive levels of nitrates in groundwater can keep on grazing their cattle without fear of further contamination from the nitrogen in cattle waste—as long as they reduce or eliminate nitrogen fertiliser use for at least a few years.

This particular wisdom comes from a study at the Agriculture Research Service North Appalachian Experimental Watershed Laboratory in Coshocton, Ohio. For several years, Lloyd Owens, a soil scientist at Coshocton, used a herd of 30 beef cows to rotationally graze four 3.2 ha fields on a hillside. Owens sampled nitrate levels in the groundwater below each field. US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for human drinking water stipulate 10 parts per million (ppm) as the maximum allowable safe level for nitrate-nitrogen. There is no danger to cattle from grazing on pastures with high nitrate levels.


Scientists have gathered data on the watersheds in this rolling countryside for more than 60 years. The fields had been used as pasture for about 30 of those years. During the 11 years before the latest study began, Owens tested heavy nitrogen fertilisation - 170 kg per ha each year - to see whether it would produce more and better grass for the cattle to graze without doing environmental harm. Unfortunately, it caused too much nitrogen to leach into the groundwater under these experimental pastures. Levels reached 13 to 26 ppm.

Stop fertilizing
Some fields are more likely to have high nitrate levels in the groundwater beneath them, and annual fertilisation can eventually turn them into problem fields. So Owens began a study to see whether he could lower nitrate levels by eliminating fertiliser for seven years and either grazing cattle or harvesting hay from the fields.
 
He compared two pastures where cattle were allowed to graze with two pastures that were fenced to keep the animals out. In the “no cattle” pastures, the grass was cut and baled for hay twice a year. “When you harvest the hay, you remove some nitrogen from the soil,” Owens says. “And when cattle graze, they remove some of the nitrogen.”
 
In the groundwater underneath three pastures, the nitrate-nitrogen levels dropped below 10 ppm within three years; after five years, the levels below all four pastures fell to 2 to 4 ppm. The withholding of fertiliser caused only a slight decrease in grass growth, so it doesn’t seem to be a serious disadvantage to farmers, especially compared to the environmental benefit. But, most importantly, it didn’t make any difference whether cattle were on the land or not.
 “It’s a nice finding, because it doesn’t force farmers to remove cattle from problem fields, as long as they stop fertilising. And it saves the time and labour of baling hay for feed,” Owens says.

 

Rating:
Click here to register for the free VetsWeb newsletter

Cattle diseases

 

 

Upcoming events

More upcoming events >

Idea Box

Vetsweb cares about the opinion of its users. We really appreciate your feedback and suggestions to improve this website.
 
 
Newsletter:
If you have missed our last news letter or would like to view or receive one: Click here